Fri 3 Jan 2014
No Frackers will go to jail if they violate WHAT LAWS? IDNR might as well give away the state of Illinois to being totally trashed. Where will the Fracking start? In our State Parks?
Day 49 1/2/13
Topic: Fines penalties, suspensions and revocations
- Go to: http://www.dnr.illinois.gov/OilandGas/Pages/OnlineCommentSubmittalForm.aspx
- Click the button: Subpart K: Enforcement
- In the “Section” dropdown box, click: 245.1110 Notice of Violation
- Submit your comment/s (below)
- Click “Submit”
For regulations to work, levied fines must exceed the financial benefit a company gains by violating the rules. None of the rulemaking sanctions meet this criterion. This results in the other 150 pages of rules being essentially meaningless because they will be ignored. The draft rule sanctions place the Hydraulic Fracturing Regulatory Act (HFRA) on the road to failure before the first permit is issued.
- Section 1-100(b) of the law specifies misdemeanor and felony criminal charges for a number of violations of the law. Yet there are NO criminal charges in the rules
- In Section 1-60(a)1-6 of the law, there are six (6) grounds for suspension or revocation of a permit. These are re-listed with a 7th in section 245.1100 of the rules. But the very next section of the Rules–245.1110–reduces the grounds for an immediate permit suspension to one: “an emergency condition posing a significant hazard to the public health, aquatic life, wildlife or the environment.” This is the most stringent requirement of the seven grounds listed in section 245.1100. Why bother to list seven possible grounds for permit suspension or revocation in section 245.1100 if you then require the Department to identify the most stringent criteria for an immediate suspension.
- Section 1-60(b) of the law requires a much lower standard of proof to suspend, revoke or deny a permit than the rules (245.1110). Under the law, the Department need only serve notice of its action (to suspend, revoke or deny), including a statement of the reasons for the action.
- In the law, if a well operator’s permit has been suspended, the burden of proof is on well operator to prove that the identified problem is “no significant threat to public health, aquatic life, wildlife, or the environment” [Section 1-60(d)]. In the rules, this phrase becomes something IDNR must prove before ordering a permit suspension [Rule Section 245.1100(b)3A].
- Sections 1-100 and 1-101 of the law have some stiff penalties that accrue on a daily basis until the reason for the fine is corrected. These fines can go as high as $50,000 per violation and up to $10,000 per day. These are replaced by fines so trivial ($50-$2500) that it will cost the IDNR more to impose and collect a fine than the dollar value of the fine itself.
Revisions Needed: Return to the standards of the law with regard to fines, penalties and revocations.
Bloomington, IL 61701
Go there and comment. We are done with this.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.