<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Thanks To Gas Turbine World &#8211; And Harry Jaeger for pointing out my error	</title>
	<atom:link href="/blog/burning-reduction-methods/thanks-to-gas-turbine-world-and-harry-jaeger-for-pointing-out-my-error/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>/blog/burning-reduction-methods/thanks-to-gas-turbine-world-and-harry-jaeger-for-pointing-out-my-error/</link>
	<description>Censys.org</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2022 19:44:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: DougNic		</title>
		<link>/blog/burning-reduction-methods/thanks-to-gas-turbine-world-and-harry-jaeger-for-pointing-out-my-error/comment-page-1/#comment-1230</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DougNic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=545#comment-1230</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Will Reynolds wanted to make this comment and could not log on, so I am posting it for him:

Hi Doug,
&gt;&gt; I was glad to see your new blog post about coal to liquids.
&gt;&gt; It doesn&#039;t
&gt;&gt; make any sense unless your goal is to create more demand
&gt;&gt; for coal.
&gt;&gt; But your first post also ignored the impacts of longwall
&gt;&gt; and mountain
&gt;&gt; top removal mining methods. That&#039;s still an issue even
&gt;&gt; if all the
&gt;&gt; other conditions were met.
&gt;&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will Reynolds wanted to make this comment and could not log on, so I am posting it for him:</p>
<p>Hi Doug,<br />
>> I was glad to see your new blog post about coal to liquids.<br />
>> It doesn&#8217;t<br />
>> make any sense unless your goal is to create more demand<br />
>> for coal.<br />
>> But your first post also ignored the impacts of longwall<br />
>> and mountain<br />
>> top removal mining methods. That&#8217;s still an issue even<br />
>> if all the<br />
>> other conditions were met.<br />
>></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
