<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>tax credits Archives - Community Energy Systems</title>
	<atom:link href="/category/blog/tax-credits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>/category/blog/tax-credits/</link>
	<description>Censys.org</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2022 19:39:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Nuclear Power &#8211; On time and under cost</title>
		<link>/blog/burning-behavior/nuclear-power-on-time-and-under-cost/</link>
					<comments>/blog/burning-behavior/nuclear-power-on-time-and-under-cost/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug Nicodemus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 17:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[burning behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Tough Love Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fossil fuels and the United States' Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green wash. corporate cover ups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry apologists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lies told by energy companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no nukes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speculators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax credits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water pollution]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4127</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Yah right. That is so laughable. Even after they announced that they were going to try to bring 5 nuclear plants on line there were no commercial backers and so the price went up before they even started. It has &#8230; <a href="/blog/burning-behavior/nuclear-power-on-time-and-under-cost/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="/blog/burning-behavior/nuclear-power-on-time-and-under-cost/">Nuclear Power &#8211; On time and under cost</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="/">Community Energy Systems</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yah right. That is so laughable. Even after they announced that they were going to try to bring 5 nuclear plants on line there were no commercial backers and so the price went up before they even <em>started</em>. It has been all downhill since then.</p>
<p><a href="http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/news-guide-building-nuclear-power-plants-16750327#.T_2tBZGkNyU">http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/news-guide-building-nuclear-power-plants-16750327#.T_2tBZGkNyU</a></p>
<h1>News Guide: Nuclear Industry Facing Cost Pressures</h1>
<div><img decoding="async" src="http://a.abcnews.com/images/Site/byline_ap.gif" border="0" alt="" /></p>
<div id="share-left">
<div></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>By The Associated Press</div>
<div>July 10, 2012 (AP)</div>
</div>
</div>
<p>Q: How many nuclear plants are under construction in the U.S.?</p>
<p>A: Three. Two nuclear reactors are being built at Plant Vogtle in  eastern Georgia. Two more reactors are under construction at Plant  Summer in central South Carolina. A fifth reactor mothballed in 1985 is  being finished at Plant Watts Bar in Tennessee.</p>
<p>Q: How often are nuclear plants built?</p>
<p>A: The last nuclear plant built in the United States was the existing reactor finished at Watts Bar in 1996.</p>
<p>Q: How much does a nuclear plant cost?</p>
<p>A: Billions of dollars. Nuclear plants are among the most complicated  and expensive infrastructure projects in the world. The plants require  incredible amounts of design and engineering work and must be built to  exacting safety standards. Federal inspectors can require that parts of  the plant be ripped out and replaced if they don&#8217;t meet muster. The  plants require huge amounts of metal, concrete, cables and wires.  Building two Westinghouse Electric Co. AP1000 reactors at Plant Vogtle  is supposed to cost roughly $14 billion, though the final expenses could  be more.</p>
<p>:}</p>
<p>Go there and read the rest. More tomorrow.</p>
<p>:}</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="/blog/burning-behavior/nuclear-power-on-time-and-under-cost/">Nuclear Power &#8211; On time and under cost</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="/">Community Energy Systems</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>/blog/burning-behavior/nuclear-power-on-time-and-under-cost/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Being Frugal Can Be Funny &#8211; Or so it seems from this blog</title>
		<link>/blog/energy-conservation-measures/being-frugal-can-be-funny-or-so-it-seems-from-this-blog/</link>
					<comments>/blog/energy-conservation-measures/being-frugal-can-be-funny-or-so-it-seems-from-this-blog/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug Nicodemus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 19:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[big whoop dee do]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cartoons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children and the environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cool sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy conservation measures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Tough Love Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gone pecan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jam band friday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[penetrating ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[playing hooky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stewardship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulating intercourse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stretching a concept]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax credits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web energy sources]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3703</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This Blog on frugality is pretty funny and maybe not for the Joe Sixpack crowd. Things like Retiring In Panama may miss them. But the post about living on food stamps was pretty informative and funny. http://www.debtfreebythirty.net/2012/02/festival-of-frugality-superheroes-are.html Festival of Frugality: &#8230; <a href="/blog/energy-conservation-measures/being-frugal-can-be-funny-or-so-it-seems-from-this-blog/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="/blog/energy-conservation-measures/being-frugal-can-be-funny-or-so-it-seems-from-this-blog/">Being Frugal Can Be Funny &#8211; Or so it seems from this blog</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="/">Community Energy Systems</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This Blog on frugality is pretty funny and maybe not for the Joe Sixpack crowd. Things like Retiring In Panama may miss them. But the post about living on food stamps was pretty informative and funny.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.debtfreebythirty.net/2012/02/festival-of-frugality-superheroes-are.html">http://www.debtfreebythirty.net/2012/02/festival-of-frugality-superheroes-are.html</a></p>
<h3>Festival of Frugality: Superheroes Are Frugal Too Edition</h3>
<div>Hello and welcome to the 325th edition of the Festival of Frugality. The  Festival of Frugality highlights personal finance posts that deal with <em>how to pinch those pennies or save that dollar</em>.</div>
<p>I am a sucker for a theme for my festivals or carnivals and while I was  tempted to do a leap year facts edition it just wasn&#8217;t exciting enough  for my blood. So superheroes it is. Because what&#8217;s more exciting than  superheroes? It also occurred to me that superheroes are quite frugal  and who hasn&#8217;t sometimes thought that superpowers are needed to stay on  the path of frugality.</p>
<p>Editor&#8217;s Super Picks</p>
<blockquote><p>Smart Family Finance has pretty convincing <strong><a href="http://www.smartfamilyfinance.com/2012/02/financial-reasons-to-get-rid-of-your-junk/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">financial reasons to get rid of your junk.</a> </strong>There are so may reasons to get rid of your &#8220;junk&#8221;. It&#8217;s nice to have one that will put cash in your wallet too.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Annabelle from Shopping Detox <a href="http://www.shoppingdetox.com/2012/02/jour-47-saskatoon-frugality-audit.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">gives her city a frugal audit. </a>This really has me thinking about my own town.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>A. Blinkin from Funancials entertains us as usual with <strong><a href="http://funancials.biz/how-do-you-judge-value/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">how do you judge value?</a></strong></p></blockquote>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>:}</p>
<p>Go there and read about Wolverine and Batman at least. More next week.</p>
<p>:}</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="/blog/energy-conservation-measures/being-frugal-can-be-funny-or-so-it-seems-from-this-blog/">Being Frugal Can Be Funny &#8211; Or so it seems from this blog</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="/">Community Energy Systems</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>/blog/energy-conservation-measures/being-frugal-can-be-funny-or-so-it-seems-from-this-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Going To The Illinois State Fair Today &#8211; Post Wednesday maybe</title>
		<link>/blog/fossil-fuels-united-states-future/going-to-the-illinois-state-fair-today-post-wednesday-maybe/</link>
					<comments>/blog/fossil-fuels-united-states-future/going-to-the-illinois-state-fair-today-post-wednesday-maybe/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug Nicodemus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 14:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[children and the environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Tough Love Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fossil fuels and the United States' Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gone pecan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illinois legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landscaping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local food production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outdoors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spirituality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[springfield energy scene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax credits]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3170</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Nuff said. &#160; http://www.agr.state.il.us/isf/ CARNIVAL SPECIAL NEW THIS YEAR- The Illinois State Fair will be offering Bargain Bracelets for all rides (excluding Giant Slide and SkyGlide). It will be conveniently available for purchase at the Carnival and Adventure Village when &#8230; <a href="/blog/fossil-fuels-united-states-future/going-to-the-illinois-state-fair-today-post-wednesday-maybe/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="/blog/fossil-fuels-united-states-future/going-to-the-illinois-state-fair-today-post-wednesday-maybe/">Going To The Illinois State Fair Today &#8211; Post Wednesday maybe</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="/">Community Energy Systems</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nuff said.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.agr.state.il.us/isf/">http://www.agr.state.il.us/isf/</a></p>
<p><strong>CARNIVAL SPECIAL</strong><br />
NEW THIS YEAR- The Illinois State Fair will be offering Bargain  Bracelets for all rides (excluding Giant Slide and SkyGlide).  It will  be conveniently available for purchase at the Carnival and Adventure  Village when you arrive to enjoy the fair.  This Bargain Bracelet will  replace Children&#8217;s Miracle Network Wristbands.</p>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Thursday, August 11</td>
<td>&#8220;Deuce Day&#8221; All rides $2.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2"><strong>Experience unlimited rides with a Bargain Bracelet for $25.00!</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Friday, August 12</td>
<td>12-6 PM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Monday, August 15</td>
<td>12-11 PM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tuesday, August 16</td>
<td>12-11 PM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Wednesday, August 17</td>
<td>12-11 PM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Thursday, August 18</td>
<td>12-11 PM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Friday, August 19</td>
<td>12-6 PM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Sunday, August 21</td>
<td>NOON-10 PM</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: verdana,arial,helvetica; font-size: x-small;">Grandstand reserved seats and track tickets on sale Saturday, April 30, 2011, 10:00 a.m. at <a href="http://www.ticketmaster.com/venue/57371" target="_new" rel="noopener"><strong>ticketmaster.com</strong></a> and Ticketmaster Phone centers  (800-745-3000, TTY-800-359-2525) and  all Ticketmaster outlets.   Grandstand ticket office will accept Mail  Orders starting Monday, May 30, 2011. Grandstand box office will open for walk-up sales  starting June 4, 2011 at 9:00 a.m.  All adults and children 3 years of age and older <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">MUST</span></strong> have a ticket for Concerts.<strong>MAIL ORDER WILL BE ACCEPTED</strong> &#8211; after May 30, 2011 at: The Illinois State Fair Ticket Office, P.O. Box 19427, Springfield, IL 62794-9427.</p>
<p>Order tickets via U.S. mail with our <a href="http://www.agr.state.il.us/isf/gstand/orderform.pdf"><strong> order form</strong></a>.</p>
<p></span></span></span></p>
<p>:}</p>
<p>More tomorrow maybe.</p>
<p>:}</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="/blog/fossil-fuels-united-states-future/going-to-the-illinois-state-fair-today-post-wednesday-maybe/">Going To The Illinois State Fair Today &#8211; Post Wednesday maybe</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="/">Community Energy Systems</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>/blog/fossil-fuels-united-states-future/going-to-the-illinois-state-fair-today-post-wednesday-maybe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Residential Solar Down To A $1.57 Per Watt &#8211; Cool breeze</title>
		<link>/blog/burn-free-generation/residential-solar-down-to-a-1-57-per-watt-cool-breeze/</link>
					<comments>/blog/burn-free-generation/residential-solar-down-to-a-1-57-per-watt-cool-breeze/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug Nicodemus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 16:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[advanced energy structures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[burn free generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Tough Love Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photovoltaic panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar water heat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax credits]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3106</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>At least that is what the folks at SunWize claim. http://www.sunwize.com/aboutsw/sunwize-solar-energy-index.php SunWize headquarters and East Coast distribution facility in Kingston, NY What Can SunWize Do For You? From manufactured specialty modules to prepackaged units to site installed systems to an &#8230; <a href="/blog/burn-free-generation/residential-solar-down-to-a-1-57-per-watt-cool-breeze/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="/blog/burn-free-generation/residential-solar-down-to-a-1-57-per-watt-cool-breeze/">Residential Solar Down To A $1.57 Per Watt &#8211; Cool breeze</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="/">Community Energy Systems</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least that is what the folks at SunWize claim.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sunwize.com/aboutsw/sunwize-solar-energy-index.php">http://www.sunwize.com/aboutsw/sunwize-solar-energy-index.php</a></p>
<p>SunWize headquarters and East Coast distribution facility in Kingston, NY</p>
<h1>What Can SunWize Do For You?</h1>
<p>From manufactured specialty modules to prepackaged units to site  installed systems to an extensive component inventory, SunWize meets  your power needs using photovoltaic (PV) technology. Our solar electric  systems supply reliable power where and when you need it. We design our  products and systems for maximum efficiency and minimum on-site  construction time and operation costs.</p>
<h2>Products</h2>
<p>Our pre-assembled systems are complete, fully integrated power  supplies designed to meet the requirements of your project. All systems  are easy to order, factory assembled, and simple to install and  commission. We design custom systems and products to satisfy specific  load and environmental requirements. SunWize, the premier solar electric  distributor in the USA, also supplies a large selection of solar  modules and balance of system components to its network of solar dealers  and installers.</p>
<h2>Solar Energy Design Services</h2>
<p>For over 25 years, PV has been used extensively as a distributed  power source for industrial equipment located “off the grid”. PV systems  are powering a variety of loads, such as microwave and fiber optic  repeaters, instrumentation, RTU/SCADA, cathodic protection, rural  telephony and traffic safety. Since many of these projects include a  variety of requirements and special considerations, we offer the  following project services:<br />
&#8211; Site Analysis &#8211; Specification Preparation<br />
&#8211; Personnel Training &#8211; Turnkey Installation<br />
&#8211; Installation Supervision &#8211; O&amp;M Manual Preparation<br />
&#8211; System Commissioning &#8211; O&amp;M/Service Contract</p>
<p><img decoding="async" loading="lazy" src="http://www.sunwize.com/aboutsw/img/ranch_warehouse.jpg" alt="West Coast Solar Distribution Facility" width="330" height="248" />SunWize West Coast distribution facility in Rancho Cucamonga, CA.</p>
<h1>SunWize Offers Reliable Solar Energy Solutions for Electric Power</h1>
<p>SunWize Technologies, Inc. is backed by the reputation and financial stability of its parent company , one of the world’s oldest and largest trading companies with 864 subsidiaries in over 91 countries. Read the .</p>
<h2>SunWize Facilities</h2>
<p>Our engineering and manufacturing activities are housed in a 30,000  square foot (2,787 sq. M.) facility in Kingston, New York (photo at  left) that also serves as our corporate headquarters, main distribution  facility and the center of operations for the Industrial Power Group.  The building is designed for the indoor outfitting of large  telecommunication shelters and walk-in enclosures, independent of  weather conditions.</p>
<p>Our Kingston facility also contains a comprehensive research and  development laboratory facilitates new product development offering our  customers more solutions to remote power problems. The Custom Solar  Module lab was specifically designed for our proprietary manufacturing  process.</p>
<p>In 2008, SunWize moved the Distributed Power Group headquarters to  San Jose, California where it currently conducts it&#8217;s Product  Distribution, Residential Systems and Commercial Systems operations. The  Residential Power Systems Division, headquartered in San Jose,  currently focuses on providing design, engineering, and installation  services for residential and small commercial customers in California  and Oregon and operates five regional offices. The Commercial Power  Systems Division provides similar services to large commercial,  government and industrial customers nationwide, with projects over 50kW.</p>
<p>In December 2007, SunWize acquired the former GenSelf Corporation &#8211;  the largest solar electric installer with offices in the Coachella  Valley and is currently headquartered in Tustin, California.  The  Residential Power Systems Division has also recently expanded its  operations into Oregon. The first branch is located in Philomath near  Corvallis, and serves the Interstate 5 corridor between Eugene and  Portland and throughout the Willamette Valley.</p>
<p>For the convenience of our customers, we also maintain a 71,000  square foot (6,596 sq. M.) distribution warehouse in Rancho Cucamonga,  California (photo left), providing same day shipping on the West Coast.  We retain nineteen sales offices in the United States, and offices in  Canada to support our solar customers in North America, Latin America,  Europe, the Middle East and Africa. We offer our customers in Latin  America a Spanish language catalog,  and dedicated field office.</p>
<p>:}</p>
<p>More tomorrow.</p>
<p>:}</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="/blog/burn-free-generation/residential-solar-down-to-a-1-57-per-watt-cool-breeze/">Residential Solar Down To A $1.57 Per Watt &#8211; Cool breeze</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="/">Community Energy Systems</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>/blog/burn-free-generation/residential-solar-down-to-a-1-57-per-watt-cool-breeze/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Greenest Cars For 2011 &#8211; We might as well stay on topic</title>
		<link>/blog/burning-behavior/greenest-cars-for-2011-we-might-as-well-stay-on-topic/</link>
					<comments>/blog/burning-behavior/greenest-cars-for-2011-we-might-as-well-stay-on-topic/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug Nicodemus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 17:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[advanced energy structures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big whoop dee do]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[burning behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cool sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Tough Love Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fossil fuels and the United States' Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[penetrating ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax credits]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3061</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Since Evan got me started on transportation I figure we might as well stick with it for awhile. This from Mother Earth News. The obvious suspects are the Leaf, the Volt and the Prius. You will have to go read &#8230; <a href="/blog/burning-behavior/greenest-cars-for-2011-we-might-as-well-stay-on-topic/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="/blog/burning-behavior/greenest-cars-for-2011-we-might-as-well-stay-on-topic/">Greenest Cars For 2011 &#8211; We might as well stay on topic</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="/">Community Energy Systems</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since Evan got me started on transportation I figure we might as well stick with it for awhile. This from Mother Earth News. The obvious suspects are the Leaf, the Volt and the Prius. You will have to go read the article for their reveiws but here is the lead in.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.motherearthnews.com/2011-best-green-cars-zm0z11zroc.aspx">http://www.motherearthnews.com/2011-best-green-cars-zm0z11zroc.aspx</a></p>
<h1>Best Green Cars, 2011</h1>
<p><strong><em>The hybrid  car that changed the world • The electric cars that will change the  world • $1,000s in rebates and incentives • 40 mpg for the long haul •  All-electric daily driving • 38 mpg with smiles • $2.75 to recharge • No  range anxiety • 35 mpg with zip</em></strong></p>
<p>June/July 2011</p>
<p><em>By John Rockhold</em></p>
<p>Back  in 2000, Toyota released the Prius, a gasoline-electric hybrid, in the  United States. That year, the average price of gas was just $1.49, yet  here was a quirky little car that touted 40-plus mpg. A 2004 redesign  gave the Prius even better mpg and its iconic shape, and it became so  popular Toyota couldn’t keep up with demand. Today, the Prius is the  most successful hybrid by far and has basically come to define “green  car.” It’s no surprise, then, that the Prius is back among the annual  MOTHER EARTH NEWS Best Green Cars.</p>
<p>Have you ever wondered what the  heck “Prius” actually means? It’s a Latin word meaning “to go before.”  Toyota chose it to signify that the car and its hybrid technology would  be a precursor of the energy-efficient cars of the future?—?which has  certainly proved true, given the numerous hybrids released by Toyota and  others. However, it’s the two <em>all-electric</em> cars on our 2011 list that herald the next revolution in green transportation.</p>
<p>Yes,  practical and accessible electric cars from major automakers are  finally here. Neither electric car is perfect, but the Prius wasn’t  either back in 2000. Of the many features that make the Chevrolet Volt  and Nissan Leaf compelling, their driving range and cost to own are what  may make them most appealing. The Leaf has a range of about 100 miles,  depending on driving conditions. The Volt has a shorter all-electric  range, but uses a gas engine to power its two electric motors when  needed for a total range of about 375 miles.</p>
<p>Sick of paying about  $50 to fill the tank of your gas car? How does $2 to $3 sound? Given  the national average cost of electricity (11 cents per kilowatt-hour),  that’s about what you would pay to “fill up” an electric car by  recharging it overnight. And if you’re curious about the environmental  costs of gasoline versus fossil fuel electricity, read <a title="Why Electric Cars Are Cleaner" href="http://www.motherearthnews.com/green-transportation/electric-cars-zm0z11zsto.aspx" target="_self" rel="noopener">Why Electric Cars Are Cleaner</a>.  In short, while there is regional variability, electric cars are  cleaner than gas cars. That said, the ultimate solution is to recharge  with renewable energy.</p>
<p>The three other vehicles that make up our  2011 Best Green Cars are revolutionary in their own right: The Ford  Fiesta has the best blend of affordability and efficiency; the Honda  CR-Z proves that hybrids can be fun to drive; and the Jetta TDI is the  best example of clean diesel’s efficiency and workhorse longevity.</p>
<p>Whether  you own one of these six cars now, later or never, you’ll benefit from  them. They’re making mobility greener, reducing our dependence on oil,  and instigating more innovation in the auto industry. In this new era of  green car competition, we’re all winners.</p>
<h2>Best Green Cars: Keys to the Data and the Experts</h2>
<p><strong>Base Price:</strong> the manufacturer’s suggested retail price + destination fee</p>
<p><strong>EPA Gas Mileage:</strong> official fuel economy estimates (your mileage may vary)</p>
<p><strong>Annual Fuel Cost: </strong>assumes  $3.75/gallon regular gasoline; $3.95/gallon premium gasoline;  $3.97/gallon diesel; $0.11 per kilowatt-hour of electricity; 15,000  miles driven annually at 55% city, 45% highway</p>
<p><strong>Air Pollution Score:</strong> from the EPA; zero = most tailpipe emissions, 10 = least</p>
<p><strong>Greenhouse Gas Score:</strong> from the EPA; zero = most greenhouse gas emissions, 10 = least</p>
<p><strong>ACEEE Green Score:</strong> from the <a title="American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy" href="http://www.aceee.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy</a>; the higher the score, the better; best 2011 score is 54; see <a title="www.GreenerCars.org" href="http://www.greenercars.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">www.GreenerCars.org</a></p>
<p><strong>Brad Berman:</strong> founder and editor, <a title="www.HybridCars.com" href="http://www.hybridcars.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">www.HybridCars.com</a> and <a title="www.PluginCars.com" href="http://www.plugincars.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">www.PluginCars.com</a></p>
<p><strong>Terry Penney:</strong> program manager for advanced vehicle technologies at the <a title="National Renewable Energy Laboratory" href="http://www.nrel.gov/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">National Renewable Energy Laboratory</a></p>
<p><strong>Ron Cogan:</strong> editor and publisher, <a title="Green Car Journal" href="http://www.greencar.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Green Car Journal</a></p>
<p><strong>Todd Kaho:</strong> executive editor, <a title="Green Car Journal" href="http://www.greencar.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Green Car Journal</a> and editor of <a title="www.FrugalDriver.com" href="http://www.frugaldriver.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">www.FrugalDriver.com</a></p>
<p><strong>Chelsea Sexton:</strong> founder, <a title="Lightning Rod Foundation" href="http://lightningrodfoundation.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Lightning Rod Foundation</a>; electric car advocate</p>
<p><strong>James Kliesch:</strong> research director for the clean vehicles program at the <a title="Union of Concerned Scientists" href="http://www.ucsusa.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Union of Concerned Scientists</a></p>
<p><strong>Jim Motavalli:</strong> author of <a title="High Voltage: The Fast Track to Plug in the Auto Industry" href="http://www.amazon.com/High-Voltage-Fast-Track-Industry/dp/160529263X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1304368918&amp;sr=8-1" target="_blank" rel="noopener">High Voltage: The Fast Track to Plug in the Auto Industry</a></p>
<div>
Read more: <a href="http://www.motherearthnews.com/2011-best-green-cars-zm0z11zroc.aspx#ixzz1RRLYbbIK">http://www.motherearthnews.com/2011-best-green-cars-zm0z11zroc.aspx#ixzz1RRLYbbIK</a></div>
<p>:}</p>
<p>More tomorrow.</p>
<p>:}</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="/blog/burning-behavior/greenest-cars-for-2011-we-might-as-well-stay-on-topic/">Greenest Cars For 2011 &#8211; We might as well stay on topic</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="/">Community Energy Systems</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>/blog/burning-behavior/greenest-cars-for-2011-we-might-as-well-stay-on-topic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nuclear Power In The US Is Expensive &#8211; It is too much money to meter</title>
		<link>/blog/burning-behavior/nuclear-power-in-the-us-is-expensive-it-is-to-much-money-to-meter/</link>
					<comments>/blog/burning-behavior/nuclear-power-in-the-us-is-expensive-it-is-to-much-money-to-meter/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug Nicodemus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[burning behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cool sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Tough Love Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evil polluters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green wash. corporate cover ups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry apologists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lies told by energy companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no nukes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old tired advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self inflicted wounds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax credits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water pollution]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3034</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Finns found this out real quick when they started their new Nuke 5 years ago costs estimates were 4 billion $$$. Right now they are at 7 billion $$$ and the meter is still turning. Even with 8 billion &#8230; <a href="/blog/burning-behavior/nuclear-power-in-the-us-is-expensive-it-is-to-much-money-to-meter/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="/blog/burning-behavior/nuclear-power-in-the-us-is-expensive-it-is-to-much-money-to-meter/">Nuclear Power In The US Is Expensive &#8211; It is too much money to meter</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="/">Community Energy Systems</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Finns found this out real quick when they started their new Nuke 5 years ago costs estimates were 4 billion $$$. Right now they are at 7 billion $$$ and the meter is still turning. Even with 8 billion $$$ of backing for the two new reactors at the Vogle site Georgia Power could get no money in the private sector so they are &#8220;self financing&#8221;. Anybody want to buy a cheap power company someday? But this was the wind blowing through the trees in 2003 (and you should see the 2009 update for a good laugh) when we had a President that couldn&#8217;t even pronounce the word nuclear right.</p>
<p><a href="http://web.mit.edu/nuclearpower/">http://web.mit.edu/nuclearpower/</a></p>
<div>
<h2><img decoding="async" loading="lazy" src="http://web.mit.edu/nuclearpower/img/headings/introduction.gif" alt="Introduction" width="109" height="11" /></h2>
<p>An interdisciplinary MIT faculty group decided to study the  future of  nuclear power because of a belief that this technology is an  important option for the United States and the world to meet future  energy needs without emitting carbon dioxide and other atmospheric  pollutants. Other options include increased efficiency, renewables, and  carbon sequestration, and all may be needed for a successful greenhouse  gas management strategy. This study, addressed to government, industry,  and academic leaders, discusses the interrelated technical, economic,  environmental, and political challenges facing a significant increase in  global nuclear power utilization over the next half century and what  might be done to overcome those challenges.</p>
<p>This study was supported by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation  and by MIT&#8217;s Office of the Provost and Laboratory for Energy and the  Environment.</p>
</div>
<div>
<h2><img decoding="async" loading="lazy" src="http://web.mit.edu/nuclearpower/img/headings/newsrelease.gif" alt="News Release" width="110" height="11" /></h2>
<p>MIT RELEASES INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDY ON &#8220;THE FUTURE OF NUCLEAR ENERGY&#8221;</p>
<p><em>Professors John Deutch and Ernest Moniz Chaired Effort to Identify Barriers and Solutions             for Nuclear Option in Reducing Greenhouse Gases</em></p>
<p><em>July 29, 2003</em></p>
<p>Washington, D.C. — A distinguished team of researchers from  the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and Harvard released  today what co-chair Dr. John Deutch calls &#8220;the most comprehensive,  interdisciplinary study ever conducted on the future of nuclear energy.&#8221;</p>
<p>The report maintains that &#8220;The nuclear option should be  retained precisely because it is an important carbon-free source of  power.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Fossil fuel-based electricity is projected to account for  more than 40% of global greenhouse gas emissions by 2020,&#8221; said Deutch.   &#8220;In the U.S. 90% of the carbon emissions from electricity generation  come from coal-fired generation, even though this accounts for only 52%  of the electricity produced.  Taking nuclear power off the table as a  viable alternative will prevent the global community from achieving  long-term gains in the control of carbon dioxide emissions.&#8221;</p>
<p>But the prospects for nuclear energy as an option are limited, the report finds, by four unresolved problems: <em>high  relative costs; perceived adverse safety, environmental, and health  effects; potential security risks stemming from proliferation; and  unresolved challenges in long-term management of nuclear wastes</em>.</p>
<p>The study examines a growth scenario where the present  deployment of 360 GWe of nuclear capacity worldwide is expanded to 1000  GWe in mid-century, keeping nuclear&#8217;s share of the electricity market  about constant.  Deployment in the U.S. would expand from about 100 GWe  today to 300 GWe in mid-century.  This scenario is not a prediction, but  rather a study case in which nuclear power would make a significant  contribution to reducing CO2 emissions.</p>
<p>&#8220;There is no question that the up-front costs associated  with making nuclear power competitive, are higher than those associated  with fossil fuels,&#8221; said Dr. Moniz.  &#8220;But as our study shows, there are  many ways to mitigate these costs and, over time, the societal and  environmental price of carbon emissions could dramatically improve the  competitiveness of nuclear power&#8221;</p>
<p>The study offers a number of recommendations for making the nuclear energy option viable, including:</p>
<ul>
<li>Placing increased emphasis on the once-through fuel  cycle as best meeting the criteria of low costs and proliferation  resistance;</li>
<li>Offering a limited production tax-credit to &#8216;first  movers&#8217; &#8211; private sector investors who successfully build new nuclear  plants.  This tax credit is extendable to other carbon-free electricity  technologies and is not paid unless the plant operates;</li>
<li>Having government more fully develop the capabilities to analyze life-cycle health and safety impacts of fuel cycle facilities;</li>
<li>Advancing a U.S. Department of Energy balanced long-term waste management R&amp;D program.</li>
<li>Urging DOE to establish a Nuclear System Modeling  project that would collect the engineering data and perform the analysis  necessary to evaluate alternative reactor concepts and fuel cycles  using the criteria of cost, safety, waste, and proliferation resistance.   Expensive development projects should be delayed pending the outcome  of this multi-year effort.</li>
<li>Giving countries that forego proliferation- risky  enrichment and reprocessing activities a preferred position to receive  nuclear fuel and waste management services from nations that operate the  entire fuel cycle.</li>
</ul>
<p>The authors of the study emphasized that nuclear power is  not the only non-carbon option and stated that they believe it should be  pursued as a long term option along with other options such as the use  of renewable energy sources, increased efficiency, and carbon  sequestration..</p>
<p>The members of the study team are: John Deutch (co-chair),  Ernest Moniz (co-chair), S. Ansolabehere, Michael Driscoll, Paul Gray,  John Holdren (Harvard), Paul Joskow, Richard Lester, and Neil Todreas.</p>
<p>Members of the Advisory Committee included: former U.S.  Congressman Phil Sharp (chair), former White House Chiefs of Staff John  Podesta and John Sununu, John Ahearne, Tom Cochran, Linn Draper, Ted  Greenwood, John MacWilliams, Jessica Mathews, Zack Pate, and Mason  Willrich.</p>
<p>This study was supported by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation  and by MIT&#8217;s Office of the Provost and Laboratory for Energy and the  Environment.</p>
<p><em>CONTACTS: David Dreyer / Eric London<br />
PHONE:  202-986-0033</em></p>
</div>
<h2><img decoding="async" loading="lazy" src="http://web.mit.edu/nuclearpower/img/headings/links.gif" alt="Related Links" width="111" height="11" /></h2>
<p><a href="http://web.mit.edu/mitei/">MIT ENERGY INITIATIVE (MITei)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://web.mit.edu/nse/">DEPARTMENT OF NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING (NSE)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://web.mit.edu/canes/research/fuelcycle.html">CENTER FOR ADVANCED NUCLEAR ENERGY SYSTEMS (CANES)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://web.mit.edu/ceepr/www/publications/workingpapers.html">CENTER FOR ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY RESEARCH (CEEPR)</a></p>
<p>:}</p>
<p>Really amazing stuff. More tomorrow.</p>
<p>:}</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="/blog/burning-behavior/nuclear-power-in-the-us-is-expensive-it-is-to-much-money-to-meter/">Nuclear Power In The US Is Expensive &#8211; It is too much money to meter</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="/">Community Energy Systems</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>/blog/burning-behavior/nuclear-power-in-the-us-is-expensive-it-is-to-much-money-to-meter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beautiful Energy Efficiency &#8211; Most housing designs include solar</title>
		<link>/blog/burning-reduction-methods/beautiful-energy-efficiency-most-housing-designs-include-solar/</link>
					<comments>/blog/burning-reduction-methods/beautiful-energy-efficiency-most-housing-designs-include-solar/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug Nicodemus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[burning reduction methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Tough Love Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fossil fuels and the United States' Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[light tunnels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lighting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photovoltaic panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiant barriers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[residential energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roofing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roofs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar water heat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stewardship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[super insulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax credits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water efficiency]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2980</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>All these new builds include some form of solar planning. Either in orientation, or window protection, or solar electric generation, the sun is never far from these planners minds. http://www.hgtvpro.com/hpro/green_building/article/0,3142,HPRO_27916_6024083,00.html Five Models of Energy Efficiency: A Guide to Beautiful, Energy-Efficient &#8230; <a href="/blog/burning-reduction-methods/beautiful-energy-efficiency-most-housing-designs-include-solar/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="/blog/burning-reduction-methods/beautiful-energy-efficiency-most-housing-designs-include-solar/">Beautiful Energy Efficiency &#8211; Most housing designs include solar</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="/">Community Energy Systems</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All these new builds include some form of solar planning. Either in orientation, or window protection, or solar electric generation, the sun is never far from these planners minds.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.hgtvpro.com/hpro/green_building/article/0,3142,HPRO_27916_6024083,00.html">http://www.hgtvpro.com/hpro/green_building/article/0,3142,HPRO_27916_6024083,00.html</a></p>
<p>Five Models of Energy Efficiency: A Guide to Beautiful, Energy-Efficient Homes</p>
<p>Five US builders are being honored for their exceptional achievements in high performance building at the second annual BASF <a href="http://www.hgtvpro.com/hpro/green_building/article/0,3142,HPRO_27916_5942677,00.html">Builders Challenge</a> Awards.</p>
<p>Led by the U.S Department of Energy (DOE), the Builders  Challenge is working with homebuilders across America to build a new  generation of high-performance homes, working toward the ultimate goal  of providing cost-effective, net-zero energy homes by 2030  for all  Americans.</p>
<p>To qualify for the Builders Challenge, homes must meet at least a 70 on the <a href="http://www.hgtvpro.com/hpro/green_building/article/0,3142,HPRO_27916_5946464,00.html">EnergySmart Home Scale (E-Scale)</a> &#8212; which means they must use at least 30 percent less energy than a typical new home built to code.</p>
<table border="0" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="top"><strong>2010 BUILDERS CHALLENGE AWARDEES</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Colorado Builder&#8217;s Net-Zero-Energy House Costs Just 7% to 8% More</strong></p>
<table border="0" width="125" align="right">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.hgtvpro.com/hpro/green_building/article/0,3142,HPRO_27916_6024003,00.html"><img decoding="async" loading="lazy" src="http://images.hgtvpro.com/images/articles/builderchallenge_ecofutures_home_125.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="125" height="90" /></a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Ecofutures Building Inc. developed four certified Builders  Challenge homes (two with minus-three HERS ratings). These  net-zero-energy measures represented only 7% to 8% of the total building  cost.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.hgtvpro.com/hpro/green_building/article/0,3142,HPRO_27916_6024003,00.html">See how they did it so cost-effectively &gt;&gt;</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Treating the Home as a Whole System</strong></p>
<table border="0" width="125" align="left">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.hgtvpro.com/hpro/green_building/article/0,3142,HPRO_27916_6024082,00.html"><img decoding="async" loading="lazy" src="http://images.hgtvpro.com/images/articles/builderschallenge_weekley_home_125.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="125" height="90" /></a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>By treating houses as a complete system, David Weekley Homes  qualified 280  homes for the Builders  Challenge with HERS scores  averaging 67. The homes ranged from 1,500 to 5,500 square feet.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.hgtvpro.com/hpro/green_building/article/0,3142,HPRO_27916_6024082,00.html">Get better results by treating the house as a whole system &gt;&gt;</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>College Students&#8217; Habitat for Humanity Home </strong></p>
<table border="0" width="125" align="right">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.hgtvpro.com/hpro/green_building/article/0,3142,HPRO_27916_6024089,00.html"><img decoding="async" loading="lazy" src="http://images.hgtvpro.com/images/articles/builderschallenge_yavapaicollege_home_125.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="125" height="90" /></a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Yavapai College students built a Habitat for Humanity house that  achieved the  remarkably low HERS score of minus-three. Their  1,207-square-foot home cost only $92 per sq. ft. cost to build.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.hgtvpro.com/hpro/green_building/article/0,3142,HPRO_27916_6024089,00.html">Learn how the students got it done &gt;&gt;</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Homebuilder Adds Net Zero Energy Upgrade Package </strong></p>
<table border="0" width="125" align="left">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.hgtvpro.com/hpro/green_building/article/0,3142,HPRO_27916_5946463,00.html"><img decoding="async" loading="lazy" src="http://images.hgtvpro.com/images/articles/builderchallenge_artistic_home_125.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="125" height="90" /></a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Artistic Homes of Albuquerque offers  a  net-zero-energy upgrade  option on all their homes. They&#8217;ve completed and sold 11 true  net-zero-energy homes ranging from 1,305 to 2,905 square feet and  costing between $160,000 and $300,000.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.hgtvpro.com/hpro/green_building/article/0,3142,HPRO_27916_5946463,00.html">Find out about the upgrade option &gt;&gt;</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Builder Promises Zero Energy Bill for Five Years </strong></p>
<table border="0" width="125" align="right">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.hgtvpro.com/hpro/green_building/article/0,3142,HPRO_27916_6024088,00.html"><img decoding="async" loading="lazy" src="http://images.hgtvpro.com/images/articles/builderschallenge_timobrien_home_125.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="125" height="90" /></a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Tim O&#8217;Brien, a  fanatic about eliminating air infiltration, actually got $400 <em>back</em> from the utility the first month after construction was finished. He  guarantees a zero energy cost for the first 5 years on his home.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.hgtvpro.com/hpro/green_building/article/0,3142,HPRO_27916_6024088,00.html">See what makes this builder so confident &gt;&gt; </a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>:}</p>
<p>More next week.</p>
<p>:}</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="/blog/burning-reduction-methods/beautiful-energy-efficiency-most-housing-designs-include-solar/">Beautiful Energy Efficiency &#8211; Most housing designs include solar</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="/">Community Energy Systems</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>/blog/burning-reduction-methods/beautiful-energy-efficiency-most-housing-designs-include-solar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Electric Cars Are Here To Stay &#8211; Finally after 100 years</title>
		<link>/blog/burn-free-generation/electric-cars-are-here-to-stay-finally-after-100-years/</link>
					<comments>/blog/burn-free-generation/electric-cars-are-here-to-stay-finally-after-100-years/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug Nicodemus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 16:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[advanced energy structures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[burn free generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Tough Love Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spirituality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax credits]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2795</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>But will they do any good? I am not sure if I agree with this analysis but it is pretty detailed. Please go see the rest here: http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking-news/ci_17767977?nclick_check=1 Will buying an electric car make an environmental difference? By Paul Rogers&#160; &#8230; <a href="/blog/burn-free-generation/electric-cars-are-here-to-stay-finally-after-100-years/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="/blog/burn-free-generation/electric-cars-are-here-to-stay-finally-after-100-years/">Electric Cars Are Here To Stay &#8211; Finally after 100 years</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="/">Community Energy Systems</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But will they do any good? I am not sure if I agree with this analysis but it is pretty detailed. Please go see the rest here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking-news/ci_17767977?nclick_check=1" target="_self" rel="noopener">http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking-news/ci_17767977?nclick_check=1</a></p>
<h1 id="articleTitle">Will buying an electric car make an environmental difference?</h1>
<div id="articleByline"><a href="mailto:progers@mercurynews.com?subject=San%20Jose%20Mercury%20News:%20Will%20buying%20an%20electric%20car%20make%20an%20environmental%20difference?">By Paul Rogers&nbsp;</p>
<p></a><a href="mailto:progers@mercurynews.com?subject=San%20Jose%20Mercury%20News:%20Will%20buying%20an%20electric%20car%20make%20an%20environmental%20difference?"></a><a href="mailto:progers@mercurynews.com">progers@mercurynews.com</a></p>
</div>
<p>Sure, you  might get a carpool sticker and a tax break. But if you buy an electric  car, will it make much environmental difference?</p>
<p>Experts say that  depends on three factors: What were you driving before? How is your  electricity generated? And how many other electric cars are going to be  sold?</p>
<p>In many cases, people who trade gasoline-powered cars for  electric ones won&#8217;t be dramatically lessening the smog they emit. But  when it comes to global warming, even when emissions from generating the  electricity are taken into account, electric vehicles have a much  smaller carbon footprint than gas-powered vehicles because they are much  more efficient. However, it will take a decade or more until enough  electric vehicles are on the road to make a significant impact.</p>
<p>&#8220;If  you have a person who is driving a nice, newer car, having them switch  to an electric car, there isn&#8217;t going to be much benefit in reducing  smog,&#8221; said Tom Cahill, a professor emeritus of physics at UC Davis.  &#8220;But there could be a whole lot of gain in climate change.&#8221;</p>
<p>Because  all-electric vehicles like the Nissan Leaf burn no fossil fuels, and  plug-in hybrids like the Chevy Volt burn only small amounts of gasoline,  tailpipe emissions from electric cars are basically zero. In smoggy  cities like Los Angeles, driving one on summer days may actually clean  the air because the tailpipe emissions contain less pollution than the  air.</p>
<p>Yet most people currently buying electric cars weren&#8217;t driving old,  smog-belching vehicles. They are often affluent motorists who drove  newer-model gasoline cars. And because California has for 50 years had  the toughest tailpipe standards in the nation, a 2010 gasoline-burning  car puts out only 2 percent or less of the pollution spewed by a 1980s  model.</p>
<p>Along with the national-security benefits of reducing  America&#8217;s use of foreign oil, the main societal benefit of electric cars  might be their dramatically smaller global warming footprint.</p>
<p>A 2008 study by  researchers at Carnegie Mellon University found that life-cycle  greenhouse gas emissions, which include emissions from both  manufacturing and operating a vehicle, are 32 percent less from plug-in  hybrids than from gasoline-powered cars.</p>
<p>That finding was based  on America&#8217;s electricity mix: 45 percent of U.S. electricity is  generated from coal, 23 percent from natural gas, 20 percent from  nuclear, and 12 percent from dams, solar, wind and other sources.</p>
<p>The  global warming footprint of electric cars varies by region. Some states  get nearly all their electricity from coal, the most polluting fuel.  But only 15 percent of California&#8217;s electricity comes from coal, nearly  all imported from other states, with 46 percent from natural gas, 15  percent from nuclear power, and 24 percent from dams, solar, wind and  other sources.</p>
<p>:}</p>
<p>More tomorrow.</p>
<p>:}</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="/blog/burn-free-generation/electric-cars-are-here-to-stay-finally-after-100-years/">Electric Cars Are Here To Stay &#8211; Finally after 100 years</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="/">Community Energy Systems</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>/blog/burn-free-generation/electric-cars-are-here-to-stay-finally-after-100-years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Was Looking For A Joke &#8211; What I got was this</title>
		<link>/blog/burning-behavior/i-was-looking-for-a-joke-what-i-got-was-this/</link>
					<comments>/blog/burning-behavior/i-was-looking-for-a-joke-what-i-got-was-this/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug Nicodemus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 21:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[burning behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dying planet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Tough Love Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fossil fuels and the United States' Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international energy groups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[masters of the universe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no nukes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speculators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spirituality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax credits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vampires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[why the U.S. is behind]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2774</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>I typed in &#8220;best way to avert a nuclear disaster&#8221; thinking that I might get a joke or something other then Japan&#8217;s smoking nukes. I was wrong but this guy is pretty insightful. http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article26916.html Nuclear Power Industry Praying Japan Will &#8230; <a href="/blog/burning-behavior/i-was-looking-for-a-joke-what-i-got-was-this/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="/blog/burning-behavior/i-was-looking-for-a-joke-what-i-got-was-this/">I Was Looking For A Joke &#8211; What I got was this</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="/">Community Energy Systems</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I typed in &#8220;best way to avert a nuclear disaster&#8221; thinking that I might get a joke or something other then Japan&#8217;s smoking nukes. I was wrong but this guy is pretty insightful.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article26916.html" target="_self" rel="noopener">http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article26916.htm</a>l</p>
<h1><strong>Nuclear Power Industry Praying Japan Will Avert a Nuclear Disaster </strong></h1>
<p><a href="http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Topic10.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Stock-Markets</a> / <a href="http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/News-catid-239.html">Nuclear Power</a> Mar 14, 2011 &#8211; 10:59 AM</p>
<p>By: <a href="http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/UserInfo-Martin_D_Weiss.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Martin_D_Weiss</a></p>
<p>Explosions and meltdowns at nuclear reactors in Japan this past weekend will   forever change the world of energy.</p>
<p>Authorities have already scheduled widespread power outages starting  today —   and they could continue the planned outages for weeks or even  months.</p>
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="225" align="right">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="225">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><img decoding="async" src="http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/images/2011/Mar/nuclear-power-14-1.jpg" border="0" alt="Nuclear power plant explosion in Fukushima, Japan, on Saturday, following that nation's strongest earthquake in history." /></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong><em>Nuclear   power plant explosion in Fukushima, Japan, on Saturday, following that nation’s   strongest earthquake in   history.</em></strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>But that’s just a metaphor for the sustained global energy  shortages that are   likely, as the safety and long-term viability of  nuclear power comes under more   intense scrutiny than at any time in  history.</p>
<p>How do we know that’s the likely outcome?</p>
<p>Because prior nuclear disasters, such as Three Mile Island and  Chernobyl, had   a major long-term impact on nuclear plant construction.</p>
<p>Moreover, those two disasters were ultimately written off to  antiquated   facilities or poor safety precautions. In contrast, the  Japanese nuclear   industry prides itself on safety, and the plants  struck by the earthquake had   far better staff training and equipment,  including multiple back-up systems, all   of which failed.</p>
<p>Some nuclear experts will counter that newer and safer technologies  now exist   or can be developed. But given the history of similar  promises in the past,   those are bound to fall on deaf ears.</p>
<p>The public will now ask …</p>
<p><strong>Is there a fundamental incompatibility between  the  potential   dangers of nuclear energy and  the unpredictable wrath of  Mother Nature? </strong></p>
<p>That question defies any quick answer and could take years to  resolve. Until   then, further growth in nuclear power production could  be drastically reduced,   with potentially far-reaching consequences:</p>
<ul>
<li>Chronic global energy shortages, especially in countries that  were counting   on new nuclear energy for a large portion of their  electric power.</li>
<li>Massive, long-term upward pressure on crude oil prices as  producers,   consumers, and investors upwardly revise their forecasts of  fossil fuel demand.</li>
<li>Vast sums of investor money diverted from nuclear power plant  construction   to other alternative energy sources, such as wind, solar,  and bio-fuels.</li>
</ul>
<p>:}</p>
<p>Still battling viruses. So hopefully more tomorrow.</p>
<p>:}</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="/blog/burning-behavior/i-was-looking-for-a-joke-what-i-got-was-this/">I Was Looking For A Joke &#8211; What I got was this</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="/">Community Energy Systems</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>/blog/burning-behavior/i-was-looking-for-a-joke-what-i-got-was-this/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newt Gingrich And Energy Policy &#8211; For energy advice he calls his mother and his daughter</title>
		<link>/blog/burning-behavior/newt-gingrich-and-energy-policy-for-energy-advice-he-calls-his-mother-and-his-daughter/</link>
					<comments>/blog/burning-behavior/newt-gingrich-and-energy-policy-for-energy-advice-he-calls-his-mother-and-his-daughter/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug Nicodemus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[burning behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Tough Love Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fossil fuels and the United States' Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gasoline claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry apologists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speculators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax credits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[turn it off]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2502</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>OK I can only take this for another day and I am done. These guys really do not know what they are talking about. They make up numbers that have no basis in this universe, and the reality is they &#8230; <a href="/blog/burning-behavior/newt-gingrich-and-energy-policy-for-energy-advice-he-calls-his-mother-and-his-daughter/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="/blog/burning-behavior/newt-gingrich-and-energy-policy-for-energy-advice-he-calls-his-mother-and-his-daughter/">Newt Gingrich And Energy Policy &#8211; For energy advice he calls his mother and his daughter</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="/">Community Energy Systems</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK I can only take this for another day and I am done. These guys really do not know what they are talking about. They make up numbers that have no basis in this universe, and the reality is they only survive because they take huge amounts of industry money.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ontheissues.org/2008/Newt_Gingrich_Energy_+_Oil.htm" target="_self" rel="noopener">http://www.ontheissues.org/2008/Newt_Gingrich_Energy_+_Oil.htm</a></p>
<h1>Newt Gingrich on Energy &amp; Oil</h1>
<h2>Former Republican Representative (GA-6) and Speaker of the House</h2>
<h3>Kyoto treaty is bad for the environment and bad for America</h3>
<p>Kyoto is a bad treaty. It is bad for the environment and it is bad for  America. It sets standards that will require massive investments by the  US but virtually no investments by other countries. The Senate was right  when it voted unanimously against the treaty. We should insist on revisiting the entire Kyoto process and  resolutely reject efforts to force us into an anti-American,  environmentally failed treaty.</p>
<p>The US should support substantial  research into climate science, managing the response to climate change, &amp; in developing new non-carbon energy systems. It is  astounding to watch people blithely propose trillions of dollars in  spending on a topic on which we have failed to spend modest amounts to  better understand.</p>
<p>It is astounding to have people focus myopically on carbon as the sole source of climate change.  The world’s climate has changed in the past with sudden speed and  dramatic impact. Global warming may happen. On the other hand it is  possible Europe will experience another ice age.</p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: xx-small;"> Source: Gingrich Communications website, www.newt.org Dec 1, 2006 </span></p>
<p><a name="3"></a></p>
<h3>Focus on incentives for conservation &amp; renewable resources</h3>
<p>A sound American energy policy would focus on four areas: basic research  to create a new energy system that has few environmental side effects,  incentives for conservation, more renewable resources, and  environmentally sound development of fossil fuels. The Bush administration has approached energy environmentalism the right  way, including using public-private partnerships that balance economic  costs and environmental gain.</p>
<p>Hydrogen has the potential to provide  energy that has no environmental downside. Conservation is the second great opportunity in energy. A tax  credit to subsidize energy efficient cars (including a tax credit for  turning in old and heavily polluting cars) is another idea we should  support. Renewable resources are gradually evolving to meet their potential: from wind generator farms to solar  power to biomass conversion. Continued tax credits and other advantages  for renewable resources are a must.</p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: xx-small;"> Source: Gingrich Communications website, www.newt.org Dec 1, 2006 </span></p>
<p><a name="5"></a></p>
<h3>Stop scare tactics about drilling in Alaska</h3>
<p>It is time for an honest debate about drilling and producing in places  like Alaska, our national forests, and off the coast of scenic areas.  The Left uses scare tactics from a different era to block  environmentally sound production of raw materials. Three standards should break through this deadlock.</p>
<ol>
<li>Scientists  of impeccable background should help set the standards for sustaining  the environment in sensitive areas, and any company entering the areas  should be bonded to meet those standards.</li>
<li>The public should be informed about new methods of production  that can meet the environmental standards, and any development should be  only with those new methods.</li>
<li>A percentage of the revenues from  resources generated in environmentally sensitive areas should be dedicated to environmental activities  including biodiversity sustainment, land acquisition, and environmental  cleanups in places where there are no private resources that can be used  to clean up past problems.</li>
</ol>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: xx-small;"> Source: Gingrich Communications website, www.newt.org Dec 1, 2006 </span></p>
<p><a name="7"></a></p>
<h3>Gas tax sounds OK in DC, but not outside Beltway</h3>
<p>When the Bush Administration tried to convince me that a gasoline tax  increase would be okay and would barely be noticed, I tested the theory  with two phone calls. First I called my mother-in-law in Leetonia, Ohio,  and then I called my older daughter in Greensboro, North Carolina. My mother-in-law is retired, at the time,  aged 75. She has a lot of friends who live on limited incomes, and  driving happens to be one of their pleasures. She was personally against  the idea of a gas tax increase, and she thought the idea would go down very badly with her friends. Then I  called my daughter Kathy. She runs a small business, and her husband is  the tennis coach at the university. Her reaction was, to put it mildly,  scathing. “What planet do they live on?” she asked. She thought such a tax increase was the very antithesis of  why people had elected the Republicans. After those two conversations,  any doubts I may have had simply vanished, and I opposed the tax  increase. <span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: xx-small;"> Source: <a href="http://www.ontheissues.org/The_Hard_Way.htm">Lessons Learned the Hard Way, by Newt Gingrich, p. 29-30</a> Jul 2, 1998 </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial,Arial,Helvetica; font-size: x-small;"></p>
<li><big><strong>Click here for <a href="http://www.ontheissues.org/Background_Energy_+_Oil.htm">definitions &amp; background information on Energy &amp; Oil</a>. </strong></big></li>
<li><big><strong>Click here for <a href="http://www.ontheissues.org/Policy_Energy_+_Oil.htm">policy papers on Energy &amp; Oil</a>. </strong></big></li>
<p></span></p>
<p>:}</p>
<p>God what slime. More tomorrow.</p>
<p>:}</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="/blog/burning-behavior/newt-gingrich-and-energy-policy-for-energy-advice-he-calls-his-mother-and-his-daughter/">Newt Gingrich And Energy Policy &#8211; For energy advice he calls his mother and his daughter</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="/">Community Energy Systems</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>/blog/burning-behavior/newt-gingrich-and-energy-policy-for-energy-advice-he-calls-his-mother-and-his-daughter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
