First the Present. I woke up this morning thinking about what to post for this week’s blog and after the first couple of sips of my coffee it dawned on me that we were in the middle of the comment period for the new fracking rules here in Illinois. I also quickly realized that Illinois People’s Action had been putting out these great cut and paste comments  and that they would be a valuable basis for any anti-fracking campaign in other states. I also realized that I could use it to get other fracktivists to come to IDNR’s web site to add their voices to the chorus. But first no matter what, you want your comments to count, and rumor has it that in other states email comments have been lost. Well there is a site that will print a copy of your comment and take it to IDNR so we will not run into that problem here. If you go to the site listed below you will see a place to copy your comment and if you scroll to the end of the page you will see the option for print a copy of my comment. Make sure that is checked and click submit.

http://www.ilagainstfracking.org/

Second the Past. I can forgive myself for coming to this party on day 19 because I was busy talking about global warming and the weather for the Philippian disaster and the Washington Illinois disaster. But also because there are roughly 25 days left to comment . For those of you who do comment please note the IDNR will take one comment about one part of the law at a time so when you go to the website listed below please note that you must click on a PART of the bill as a title and then make a relevant comment. Then you click submit. I am starting with day three because I did not save the first two, but I am sure IPA will send me those if i request it. For now I am just putting up as many days worth as I can so hopefully I will get all 45 up for the viewing public before the commenting period is over.

Today (Sunday, 11/17/2013) is Day 3 of IDNR 45 day comment period on hydraulic fracturing.  Will you please send IDNR a comment today?  It will take less than 5 minutes of your time.  We are also working on putting together a website to make this process even easier.  But in the meantime, we ask that you bear with us as we send you an e-mail each day.  If you are opposed to fracking and worried that the weak regulatory bill will not protect Illinois residents and the environment, please take action.

Today’s comment is on IDNR’s inadequate definition of a well site. 

Here’s what to do to make your comment today:

• Go to: http://www.dnr.illinois.gov/OilandGas/Pages/OnlineCommentSubmittalForm.aspx
• Click the “radio button”: Subpart A: General Provisions
• In the “Section” dropdown box, click 245.110 Definitions

Comment:

According to IDNR’s definitions, a “Well site” means surface areas, including the surface location of the well, occupied by all equipment or facilities necessary for, or incidental to, high volume horizontal hydraulic fracturing operations, construction, drilling, production, or plugging a well. (Section 1-5 of the Act)

While this definition might be appropriate for a well that drills straight down, as wells once did, it is not appropriate for horizontal hydraulic fracturing wells.   Horizontal hydraulic fracturing operations involve an initial drilling site that then grows to include horizontal legs radiating out from the site. Leaks or ruptures, the well’s proximity to water sources, and/or to real property are not adequately imagined by the well site definition that underpins so much of the IDNR’s approach to these regulations.

The well site definition should be expanded to include the surface area above any and all horizontal or vertical legs of the well. The current narrow definition does not adequately protect the health, safety and well-being of Illinois citizens, nor will it adequately sequester water used for human or animal consumption from accidents that can occur anywhere the drilling occurs.

A useful way of thinking of a hydraulic fracturing well site would be to compare it to an iceberg, where the small amount of ice visible at the water’s surface gives no hint of the size of the area occupied by the iceberg below the water line. The potential surface area that can be detrimentally affected by a hydraulic fracturing operation includes all land within 500, 750, or 1500 feet of a hydraulic fracturing leg (to use the IDNR’s own measurements), regardless of the leg’s horizontal or vertical relationship to the earth.

This definition is critical because setback requirements are based on IDNR’s inadequate definition of a well-site when they should, at a minimum, be based on the distance from any part of the well, including all underground horizontal legs of the well.

To adopt the current definition of well site is to apply an old understanding about what constitutes a well to an approach to drilling that has grown much more complex. The IDNR needs to reflect its understanding of the inherent and possible dangers of hydraulic fracturing by recognizing that the well site for such an operation has much greater breadth than the current definition envisions.

We would love it if you would let us know if you made a comment today!  And please feel free to call us with questions, comments, or to volunteer your time at (309) 827-9627.  Please share this with others you know and encourage them to make comments too.

In solidarity in the struggle for environmental justice,

Your friends at IPA

To remove your name from this email list click here. To unsubscribe from all emails from us click here.

:}

Got there and tell the state to protect your health and safety. More today and for awhile.

:}

As I said last week and as was discussed on Science News Friday on NPR last Friday, when is it gonna be ok to say global warming or climate change is causing the weather? Because in my estimate that has been happening for the last 10 years. Really. Russian catches on fire (twice), Australia catches fire (twice), China gets slammed by a massive snow storm, Iran gets slammed by a typhoon, and Eastern Europe is flooded so badly that hundreds die all seem to me to be indicators that there is a connection. But as the research scientist said under prodding from a very dogged interviewer, Ira Flatow, well maybe in a decade we will have enough data for something like that. Which is actually the result of the hammering of the science community received in public by the coal, oil and natural gas industry (the hydrocarbon industries in general).

http://www.latimes.com/nation/nationnow/la-na-nn-illinois-tornado-victims-20131117,0,6329450.story#axzz2lDo95w88

Tornadoes tear across Midwest, killing at least 5 in Illinois

At least five people were killed Sunday in a tornado outbreak that left dozens more injured across the Midwest, and officials feared the toll could rise as emergency responders sifted through the wreckage.

Illinois has suffered the brunt of the storms’ wrath, which swept through communities in Missouri, Indiana and Kentucky, smashing homes, toppling cell towers and tossing cars in a rare November tornado outbreak. One twister was estimated to be half a mile wide.

An elderly man and his sister were found dead after a tornado struck their farmhouse in New Minden in southern Illinois, Washington County coroner Mark Styninger told the Associated Press.

About 100 miles to the south, a twister pounced on a trailer park in the tiny riverside community of Brookport, Ill. A representative of Massac County’s emergency response office said officials had received unconfirmed reports of fatalities and of residents trapped in the wreckage.

“It’s a mess,” Larry Douglas, a former manager of the Massac County Emergency Services and Disaster Agency and a current agency volunteer, told the Los Angeles Times.

[Updated, 7:30 p.m. Nov. 17: By Sunday evening, officials had confirmed five deaths, the Chicago Tribune reported — one in Washington and four in the southern part of the state.]

A preliminary report from the National Weather Service said at least 50 mobile homes in two trailer parks could have taken a “direct hit.”

:}

Go there and read. More next week…especially if the weather gets bad.

:}

Some Anti-Fracking Activists Change Tactics, Tone

By KEVIN BEGOS and MICHAEL RUBINKAM 10/06/13

PITTSBURGH — PITTSBURGH (AP) — For years, activists have warned that fracking can have disastrous consequences — ruined water and air, sickened people and animals, a ceaseless parade of truck traffic.

Now some critics are doing what was once unthinkable: working with the industry. Some are even signing lucrative gas leases and speaking about the environmental benefits of gas.

In one northeastern Pennsylvania village that became a global flashpoint in the debate over fracking, the switch has raised more than a few eyebrows.

A few weeks ago, Victoria Switzer and other activists from Dimock endorsed a candidate for governor who supports natural gas production from gigantic reserves like the Marcellus Shale, albeit with more regulation and new taxes. Dimock was the centerpiece of “Gasland,” a documentary that galvanized opposition to fracking, and Switzer was also featured in this summer’s “Gasland Part II,” which aired on HBO.

:}

Go there and read. More next week.

:}