Its Jam Band Friday – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3I1bBcda4Ko
:}
Why is that. Because the WHOLE world is polluted. Most of these places didn’t even make the last two lists.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2010-05-19/americas-28-most-polluted-places/
Our Most Polluted States
by  The Daily Beast  Info 
 
 Greenpeace marine biologist Paul  Horsman shows globs of oil on a jetti at the mouth of the Mississippi  River on May 17, 2010. (John Moore / Getty Images) 									 									As the EPA and BP fight over the Gulf oil spill cleanup,  the Daily Beast crunches the numbers and ranks the most contaminated  sites in the nation.
The BP oil rig explosion has led to untold millions in lost income  for people who make their living from the Gulf, but toxic hazards are an  everyday occurrence: The EPA estimates that there are 3,500 chemical  spills each year, requiring $260 million to clean.
Above those, however, are the Superfund sites—places that have  sustained major, long-term damage, necessitating years of cleanup.  Established in 1980 after a series of toxic disasters, including the  infamous Love Canal district of Niagara Falls, which turned the  neighborhood into a virtual ghost town, Superfund has largely succeeded  in centralizing hazardous waste cleanup and holding responsible parties  financially accountable.
The BP fiasco—both a natural and human disaster—got us thinking: what  are today’s most polluted toxic dumping grounds? To figure it out, we  examined all available Superfund data from the Environmental Protection  Agency. We filtered the results, focusing on sites that remain dangerous  for human exposure and sites that have dangerous ground water. And then  we ranked them using the following criteria:
·     Toxicity per acre: The  number of instances of each toxin, multiplied by the severity of each  toxin, according to the Agency for Toxic Substances & Disease  Registry, and divided by the acreage of the site.
·     Toxicity per population: To  determine potential human exposure we took the number of instances of  each toxin, multiplied by the severity of each toxin, and divided by the  population within one mile of the site. (The EPA gives a population  range, and we used the higher number for this calculation.)
Since toxicity per acre is a more concrete statistic than potential  human exposure (one can live near a toxic site and avoid contact), we  weighted the former three times the impact of the latter. An important  note: The human exposure element does not measure exposure levels, but  rather indicates that the EPA believes there is a reasonable expectation  that people may be exposed to contamination—exactly what the Superfund  teams spend their time trying to alleviate.
:}
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2maAPVOZlkc&feature=fvw
:}
Acres: 2
Population: 10,000
Toxic chemicals: 34
History: From 1949 to 1991 Fletcher’s Paint Works operated a  retail store and storage facility in this small New Hampshire town along  the Souhegan River. In 1982 New Hampshire officials found leaking and  open drums of paint chemicals in the storage area. Soil and groundwater  around the site was later found contaminated with arsenic, lead, PCBs,  and a slew of other nasty chemicals. The nearby Keyes Municipal Water  Supply Well was shut down in the early 1980s after it was found  contaminated by volatile organic compounds—gases emitted from paint and  other household supplies. Cleanup began in 1988 and continues today. The  EPA has tested homes in the area for gases seeping from soil into  basements, with no health risks found in the homes and another round of  testing due for June 2010. The main concern now is that fish in the  Souhegan contain PCBs, and that the EPA has found evidence of people  fishing in the river.
:}
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vtCJp1h45gA&feature=related
:}
#2, Haverford, Pennsylvania:
Havertown PCP 
Acres: 15
Population: 50,000
Toxic chemicals: 59
History: Getting rid of toxic waste used to be so simple.  National Wood Preservers, which treated wood on the site from 1947 to  1963, would take their liquid waste lined with pentachlorophenols (PCPs)  to a well, and dump it down. Or they would toss the PCP-laden liquid  onto the ground. A nearby stream was contaminated, though residents  living within a mile of the site don’t use it for drinking water. In  1992 the EPA removed 97,000 tons of liquid waste, and 60 tons of sludge  from the site. The EPA is armed with $4.2 million from the Recovery Act  to finish the final cleanup phase, which includes removing contaminated  soil from residential property and public spaces.
:}
There is 2. For the rest read the article. HAPPY LABOR DAY everyone. More next week.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VX0cMoOiIMQ&feature=related
:}